Q: Judas betrayed Jesus to fulfill an Old Testament prophecy. Why is Judas considered a traitor?
A: Judas is a traitor because he betrayed Jesus by his own free will. Yes, the Old Testament predicted that the Messiah would be betrayed (by 30 pieces of silver no less!), but it didn’t have to be Judas. That was his choice; God didn’t make him do it. God, who sees all time, knows the future before it happens. We call that foreknowledge. What I think you find troubling here is the notion that God predestined Judas to commit his act. If he was merely a puppet in God’s hands, how could he be responsible? There is a vast difference between foreknowing something and foreordaining it. Because we are free, God does not foreordain our actions. He knows ahead of time what we will do. (Calvinists will take exception to this, but that’s ok… I’m not a Calvinist!) If you are troubled by the notion that God preordained Judas to commit this crime and then condemned him for it, I share your concern. That isn’t how it happened with Judas and it isn’t how it works with us. We are free moral agents, responsible to God for our actions.
8 comments:
Jesus chose Judas because he would betray him. Jesus had an encounter with Judas as a child, casting a demon out of him. Judas hit Jesus on the side where He was pierced with a spear. Jesus would later choose Judas to fulfill His mission on Earth, because Jesus, knowing all things, knew Judas would betray Him and thus set into motion the events leading to salvation for those who would accept Jesus.
From what source are you getting your material? This isn't in the Bible.
The encounter with Judas as a child comes from the Arabic Gospel of the Infancy of the Lord Jesus Christ, the fact that Jesus used Judas to do what needed to be done is evident in both the Bible and from the Gospel of Judas. John says himself at the end of his gospel that there are many other things which Jesus did that were not contained within the books we now have as our Bible. The website, for anyone who wishes to check out the Arabic Gospel is http://wesley.nnu.edu/biblical_studies/noncanon/gospels/infarab.htm
Like other apocryphal books, the book you reference was not accepted into the New Testament canon by the early church - for good reasons. It was compiled in the sixth century, 500 years after the youngest of the New Testament books, and does not have authoritative, eyewitness authorship. The Arabic Gospel is similar to legendary stories about George Washington cutting down the cherry tree: stories that may have an element of truth but were largely embellished. The story you mention about Judas has no New Testament backing.
Carbon dating is shakey at best. Besides, how do we know these other gospels weren't copied by someone who knew said apostle, much like Mark copied for Peter, and Luke, the great investigative journalist, wrote his from gathering sources including Matthew, and eyewitness testamonies?
We know from manuscript evidence and what the early church fathers report. They were closer to the source and had a better handle on what was legit or not. The ultimate test is the content itself: Does it jive with the other testimonies? If not, then it isn't a true testimony.
It's simply a different interpretation of the events. Why did Jesus choose Judas if He knew Judas would betray Him? Because He had a job for Judas to do, that was to turn Him in to the authorities so that He could fulfill His purpose that God sent Him for.
Never answered my last post? It's been over 3 months.
Post a Comment